Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim week
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 20:46, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD; local festival with no indication in the article of notability. Leading to addition of the PROD (I inadvertantly had been the second to do so) including searching the archives of the Corvallis local newspaper and consulting the Corvallis, Oregon tourist information site rather than relying on a broad google search. The festival might be quite important to the participants, but there is not an indication of why it would be otherwise notable to a broader audience. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:21, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Bigtop 00:29, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete - croissants? Josh Parris#: 00:32, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete week we should have a festival too. Danny Lilithborne 03:47, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete "Jim week" + Corvallis=Zero g-hits. Probable vanity for a group of folks who are friends of "Jim" who meet at a local coffee house, or hoax. My friends and I go to McMenamins every week, can we have an article too? Katr67 07:50, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no sources provided or findable -- Whpq 16:46, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. and others. feydey 18:09, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unreferenced non-notable event. —ShadowHalo 03:54, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.